|
Manuswini
| |
| | Tuesday, September 19, 2006 - 2:32 pm: | 
| 
|
अरे यार सशल तुम्ही लोकांनी common sense ठेवला का घरी कळत नाही 
मी philly गेले होते तेव्हा तिकडच्या beach resort ला होते.
offcourse ca वरुन drive करून सकाळी सकाळी philly ला गेले नाही
|
Sashal
| |
| | Tuesday, September 19, 2006 - 3:27 pm: |
|
|
Manuswini, Philly हून coastline खूप दूर आहे .. तेव्हा तूझाच common sense नक्की कुठे हरवलाय त्याकडे लक्ष दे .. * CA च्या coast वर sunrise काय दिसतो, philly ला beach आहे .. किती हे अज्ञान .. 
|
Manuswini
| |
| | Tuesday, September 19, 2006 - 4:40 pm: |
|
|
दूर आहे म्हणुन तिथे कोणी resort नसते का तिथे जवळपास?
तु पण काय ग?
|
Mawla
| |
| | Wednesday, September 20, 2006 - 12:53 am: |
|
|
Alhad..Big Sur mastach re...
Prashant....The best landscape i have ever seen.. Looks like 3D.
When I shoot with Velvia..I viewed slides with magnifing glass..and some of them looked ok..then I printed in lab, I was disappointed with the results and the amount i spend on it and after that never touched Velvia....
I am little confused about work flow..
First you shoot with slide film like Velvia.
Then develope and you gets slides...
Do you scan slides or you print and then scan to jpg/or other formats?
Please guide us in details about the workflow for slides.
inspired by alhad
|
When I shoot with Velvia..I viewed slides with magnifing glass..and some of them looked ok..then I printed in lab, I was disappointed with the results and the amount i spend on it and after that never touched Velvia.... >>>>
Never let a lab (actually a drug store) at the corner print your slides. We bought a drum scanner about a year ago. Expensive equipment, so we are three together. It is better to scan them yourself or a pro-lab scan it for you. Scanning 'prints' is a very bad idea if you have your negative or positive. As usual there is no magic bullet here. You need to spend time learning the craft. The same is true of exposure for slides.
Actually my favorite color film is NPS160, a negative. And Ilford50 which I develop in D76 or ID-11. Both are dream to scan compared to velvia.
|
Oh, thanks for your compliment Mawla. Actually it is also one my favorite image. Many people find it dark, I find it moody. Next three weekends I will be at this place taking workshops, excited.
|
Nalini
| |
| | Wednesday, September 20, 2006 - 7:13 am: |
|
|
दिसायला अगदी मोहक. पटकन तोडून घ्यावेसे वाटणारे. पण तोडण्याचा मोह आवरावा लागतो कारण ते विषारी आहे.
Fly agarics (Amanita muscaria)
|
Lopamudraa
| |
| | Wednesday, September 20, 2006 - 7:30 am: |
|
|
mastay nailini.. chaan aalay photo!!!!
|
Moodi
| |
| | Wednesday, September 20, 2006 - 8:00 am: |
|
|
नलिनी फारच गोड आणि आकर्षक आहेत. रंग पण माझा आवडता. विषारी आहेत वाटत नाही, आणि किती समजुन घ्यावे लागते यांच्या जाती प्रजातीबद्दल.
|
Bhagya
| |
| | Wednesday, September 20, 2006 - 8:06 pm: |
|
|
नलू छानच ग. रोम ला जाउन आलीस का?
|
Prasadp77
| |
| | Thursday, September 21, 2006 - 12:44 am: |
|
|
@ Prashant,
>>You need to spend time learning the craft>>
I have been trying to learn how I can scan using Nikon Coolscan 4000ED and I am almost on the verge of nervous breakdown.. I have read lot of things on the web but I just seem to get colours correctly after scanning.
Whoever has read Prashant's statement, read it over and over before getting into it. It is REALLY difficult unless you have some guru besides you.
|
I have been trying to learn how I can scan using Nikon Coolscan 4000ED and I am almost on the verge of nervous breakdown..>>
Prasad,
Well, all I can say is you are not the only one. And I'll say it again there is no magic bullet. You should really try to do it all over again when you have some time. You have to remember that it is just a tool. One thing I try to do is get (out of the scanner) as "flat" an image as possible. This may sound contradicting. However, it allows me to extract more details. 4000ED is one heck of a scanner, if I were shooting 35mm film this is the one I would buy or any other coolscan version.
The same is true of digital cameras. Many think I paid $1000+ for this and it should give me the results. Now check out these two images, (1 and 2) and try to guess which is film and which is digital. Workflow is important. It takes time but is worth it.
Just for fun I'll be doing comparison of participant's lenses and mine during the workshop I'm taking on 7th. I have 17-40L and 70-200L and they will be bringing their 24-135 Tamron, few primes. I have also done a test between 50mm canon prime and 50mm carl zeiss lense. I will publish it soon. If interested I'll send you the link. Do post some more Rome pics, it is my favorite place. I was there once for a meeting. May be next summer we'll have our holidays there.
|
Nikonlover
| |
| | Thursday, September 21, 2006 - 7:04 pm: |
|
|
MawLa,
I agree 110% with Prashant. Never let the any lab directly print your slides (or anything for that matter!)
I usually scan at home. Then Post process it. Also I would use the printer profile of the lab printer I'll be using. (Most of the labs do publish their printer profiles). Post process it using that profile, so that your prints will match (almost)to whatever you see on your monitor. Otherwise it looks good on your monitor and will get different results when you print it!
Prasad,
I have a nikon coolscan-V ED scanner. It works very well for me.(I can't afford to drum scan every image or buy a drum scanner yet..).
Prashant,
Very nice landscapes.
|
Thanks NL.
Also I would use the printer profile of the lab printer I'll be using>>>
Hmm, do you mean you do all the post processing using that profile? It is not needed or lets say advisable.
I must mention though, with cameras such as D200 or 5D you get as good results. I have been talking about medium format (6x7) and 4x5 film.
|
मी कढलेले कही फोटो.
 
SUNSET
WHAT A COLOUR !!
|
|
|
